Despite the numerous advantages offered by the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the Unitary Patent system, there are several challenges and criticisms that have been raised by stakeholders.
4.1. Complexity and Cost of Litigation:
The UPC’s centralized system, while efficient, can lead to higher litigation costs compared to national courts, particularly in cases involving complex legal arguments and multiple parties.Â
The requirement for defendants to provide security for costs can also impose significant financial burdens on litigants.
Businesses are concerned about the potential for increased legal expenses due to the need for multi-jurisdictional legal representation, which can be particularly challenging for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
4.2. Risk of Pan-European Injunctions:
The UPC has the authority to issue pan-European injunctions, which can be a double-edged sword. While this provides powerful enforcement capabilities, it also means that a single adverse decision can have widespread impact across multiple countries.
This raises the stakes for defendants, who may face significant business disruptions if an injunction is granted against them.
4.3. Loss of National Jurisdiction and Legal Diversity:
Critics argue that the UPC undermines national sovereignty by centralizing patent litigation in a single court. This shift away from national courts could lead to the erosion of local legal traditions and practices that have developed over time.
Furthermore, some stakeholders are concerned about the potential for forum shopping, where litigants might choose jurisdictions perceived as more favorable to their cases.
4.4. Challenges with Opting Out:
During the seven-year transitional period (which may be extended to 14 years), patent holders can opt out of the UPC’s jurisdiction for their existing European patents. However, this process is complex and requires strategic decisions.
Once the opt-out period ends, all non-opted-out patents will automatically fall under the UPC’s jurisdiction, potentially complicating litigation strategies for companies used to dealing with national courts.
4.5. Impact on Patent Strategies:
The introduction of the UPC and Unitary Patent system necessitates a reevaluation of patenting strategies.Â
Companies must now consider whether to pursue unitary patents, which offer broader protection but also greater risks if invalidated, or to stick with traditional European patents and national patents to maintain some level of jurisdictional diversity and risk mitigation.
4.6. Readiness and Implementation Issues:
The operational readiness of the UPC has been questioned, particularly in the context of establishing new central division seats, such as the one recently allocated to Milan.
Ensuring that the court is fully functional and capable of handling complex cases efficiently is a significant concern. Delays and logistical challenges could undermine the system’s effectiveness in its early stages.
While the UPC and Unitary Patent system aim to streamline patent litigation and enhance legal certainty across Europe, these challenges highlight the complexities and potential risks involved in this significant transformation of the European patent landscape.
As the system evolves, it will be crucial to address these concerns to ensure its success and acceptance among the diverse stakeholders in the intellectual property community.